Part 3: Aftermath and Lessons for Semi-Peripheral Development
The Long Depression of the 1890s
The immediate crisis of 1890-1891 was followed by a protracted period of economic difficulty that shaped Argentina’s development for the remainder of the nineteenth century. The depression of the 1890s, while less dramatic than the initial collapse, imposed sustained costs on Argentine society and influenced the country’s subsequent economic trajectory. Understanding this extended aftermath is essential for appreciating the full consequences of the Baring Crisis.
Economic Recovery and Its Limits
Argentina’s economy began showing signs of recovery by the mid-1890s, but the path back to pre-crisis levels of activity was slow and uneven. GDP growth resumed, driven by the continued expansion of agricultural exports, but per capita income did not regain its 1889 peak until approximately 1903. The lost decade of the 1890s represented a significant setback in Argentina’s convergence toward developed-country living standards.
The pattern of recovery revealed persistent structural changes resulting from the crisis. The financial sector remained significantly smaller relative to the economy than it had been during the 1880s, as the failures and restructurings of the crisis years eliminated numerous banks and financial intermediaries. Credit conditions remained tight well into the late 1890s, constraining investment and economic expansion.
The composition of economic activity shifted in response to the crisis. Railway construction, which had been a major driver of growth and a primary destination for foreign investment, slowed dramatically. New railway mileage added during the 1890s was a fraction of what had been constructed during the previous decade. The era of extensive infrastructure development financed by foreign capital had effectively ended.
The Return to the Gold Standard
One of the defining challenges of post-crisis Argentine economic policy was the question of whether and how to restore the gold standard. The suspension of convertibility in 1889 had been intended as a temporary measure, but the disruptions of the crisis years made restoration increasingly difficult. The debate over monetary policy would dominate Argentine economic discourse throughout the 1890s.
The Conversion Law of 1899 (Ley de Conversión) finally established a mechanism for returning to the gold standard, though at a significantly depreciated rate. The gold peso was defined at a value of 0.44 gold pesos per paper peso, effectively ratifying the devaluation that had occurred during the crisis. The establishment of the Caja de Conversión (Conversion Office) provided an institutional framework for maintaining the new parity.
The successful stabilization represented a significant achievement, but it came at substantial cost. The deflationary adjustments required to restore credibility imposed hardship on debtors and contributed to the prolonged nature of the depression. Moreover, the constraints of the gold standard would limit Argentine policy options in subsequent periods of difficulty, contributing to future crises.
Fiscal Adjustment and Institutional Development
The crisis forced significant changes in Argentine fiscal practices and institutions. The casual approach to public borrowing that had characterized the 1880s was no longer tenable in an environment of restricted access to international capital markets. Successive governments pursued fiscal consolidation, eventually achieving sustainable budget positions by the late 1890s.
The institutional framework for fiscal management improved considerably. The crisis experience demonstrated the dangers of excessive provincial borrowing, leading to reforms that strengthened national government control over subnational finances. The guaranteed bank system was abolished, and monetary authority was eventually consolidated in the Caja de Conversión.
However, the improvements in fiscal institutions proved insufficient to fundamentally alter Argentina’s vulnerability to external shocks. The country remained dependent on export revenues for government finance, and the concentration of exports in a few primary commodities meant that fiscal stability was hostage to world market conditions. The structural vulnerabilities that had contributed to the Baring Crisis were attenuated but not eliminated.
Political Transformations
The End of an Era
The Baring Crisis and its aftermath marked a significant transition in Argentine political life. The generation of leaders who had presided over the liberal development model of the 1880s was discredited by the crisis, creating space for new political forces. The Unión Cívica Radical, which emerged from the 1890 revolution, would become a major political party advocating broader political participation and challenging the oligarchic politics of the preceding era.
The crisis also affected the relationship between the Argentine state and foreign capital. While Argentina remained dependent on foreign investment for development, the terms of engagement shifted. Foreign investors faced greater regulatory oversight and less favorable treatment than they had enjoyed during the boom years. The trauma of the crisis created lasting skepticism about the benefits of unrestricted capital flows.
The social changes precipitated by the crisis and depression contributed to the emergence of new political movements. Labor organization, which had begun during the crisis years, continued to develop throughout the 1890s and into the twentieth century. The immigrant working class that had been so severely affected by the depression became an increasingly important political constituency.
Institutional Legacies
The crisis left significant institutional legacies that would shape Argentine development for decades. The Caja de Conversión, established to manage the currency board arrangement, became a central institution in Argentine economic governance. Its technical competence and relative independence from political pressures represented an improvement over pre-crisis monetary institutions.
However, the institutional framework also embedded constraints that would prove problematic in later periods. The rigid commitment to the gold standard limited policy flexibility in responding to external shocks. When the Great Depression struck in the 1930s, Argentina found itself again facing the choice between deflationary adjustment and abandonment of the fixed exchange rate—a choice that echoed the dilemmas of 1889.
Parallels with Modern Emerging Market Crises
Recurring Patterns
The Baring Crisis exhibits striking parallels with financial crises that have affected emerging markets in more recent decades. These similarities suggest that certain patterns of financial instability may be structural features of the international economic system rather than idiosyncratic historical events.
The boom-bust cycle observed in Argentina during the 1880s and 1890s recurs throughout the history of capital flows to developing economies. The Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s, the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, and the European sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 all display similar patterns: initial capital inflows attracted by high returns, asset price inflation and credit expansion, mounting external vulnerabilities, and eventual crisis when investor sentiment shifts.
The role of fixed exchange rate regimes in crisis dynamics also recurs across historical periods. Just as the gold standard constrained Argentine policy options in 1889, currency pegs and currency boards have limited adjustment mechanisms in more recent crises. The Argentine crisis of 2001-2002, which involved the collapse of a currency board arrangement, echoed the Baring Crisis in its origins and dynamics.
The Semi-Peripheral Condition
The concept of semi-peripheral status provides a framework for understanding why certain countries appear particularly vulnerable to financial crises. Semi-peripheral economies are sufficiently integrated into the international financial system to attract substantial capital flows, yet lack the institutional depth and economic diversification that provide resilience in core countries. This intermediate position creates specific vulnerabilities.
Argentina’s experience illustrates the semi-peripheral condition in several respects. The country was a major destination for British capital, yet lacked the diversified economy and deep financial markets that might have cushioned external shocks. Its export concentration in primary commodities exposed it to terms-of-trade volatility. Its fiscal and monetary institutions, while more developed than those of purely peripheral economies, proved inadequate to the challenges of managing capital flow cycles.
The recurring nature of Argentine financial crises throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries suggests that semi-peripheral status creates persistent vulnerabilities that are difficult to overcome through policy reforms alone. Countries in this position face structural constraints that make certain types of crisis more likely, regardless of specific policy choices.
Lessons for Financial Regulation
The Baring Crisis offers lessons for financial regulation that remain relevant today. The concentration of risk at Baring Brothers—with the bank’s survival dependent on a single country’s economic performance—represents a failure of risk management that modern regulatory frameworks attempt to prevent. Diversification requirements, stress testing, and limits on single-name exposures all address the type of concentrated risk that nearly destroyed Baring.
The success of the Bank of England’s rescue operation demonstrates the importance of effective lender-of-last-resort facilities and crisis management capabilities. However, it also illustrates the moral hazard problems inherent in such interventions. Baring had taken excessive risks in part because its principals expected that the firm was “too big to fail”—an expectation that the rescue validated. The challenge of providing crisis resolution while maintaining market discipline remains unresolved.
The international dimension of the Baring rescue prefigures later efforts at international financial cooperation. The Bank of France’s gold loan and the coordination among major financial institutions demonstrated that effective crisis management might require international action. This precedent would eventually lead to the development of formal international financial institutions, including the International Monetary Fund.
Theoretical Implications
World-Systems Analysis and Financial Crises
The Baring Crisis provides empirical support for world-systems approaches to understanding financial instability. Immanuel Wallerstein’s framework, which emphasizes the hierarchical structure of the world economy and the distinct positions of core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral zones, illuminates the dynamics observed in 1890.
The flow of capital from Britain (core) to Argentina (semi-periphery) reflected the structural features of the world economy: capital accumulated in the core sought higher returns in regions with greater growth potential but less developed institutions. The eventual crisis resulted from the contradictions inherent in this arrangement—the semi-periphery could not indefinitely absorb capital inflows without eventually facing adjustment pressures.
The role of Baring Brothers as an intermediary illustrates how core institutions extract surplus while transmitting risk to the semi-periphery. Baring earned substantial fees from Argentine business during the boom years, but the risks accumulated in Argentina. When crisis struck, Argentina bore the primary costs through depression and default, while the Bank of England rescue protected British investors from the full consequences of their risk-taking.
Minsky and Financial Instability
Hyman Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis provides another lens for understanding the Baring Crisis. Minsky argued that stability is destabilizing: periods of prosperity encourage increasingly risky financial practices, eventually creating conditions for crisis. The dynamics observed in Argentina during the 1880s closely match Minsky’s theoretical expectations.
The progression from hedge finance to speculative finance to Ponzi finance can be observed in Argentine government and private-sector borrowing during the pre-crisis period. Initial borrowing was supported by expectations of returns sufficient to service debt. As the boom continued, borrowing increasingly depended on asset price appreciation rather than income generation. By the late 1880s, much borrowing could only be serviced through continued access to new credit—the Ponzi condition that made crisis inevitable when credit dried up.
Implications for Development Economics
The Baring Crisis raises important questions for development economics regarding the role of foreign capital in economic development. Argentina’s experience suggests both the potential benefits and significant risks of relying on external finance for development. The infrastructure constructed with British capital during the 1880s contributed to Argentina’s long-term productive capacity, but the crisis and depression imposed severe costs that offset these benefits.
The experience also illuminates the challenges of development in an international environment shaped by the interests of core countries and institutions. Argentina’s policy options were constrained by its need to maintain access to British capital markets and satisfy foreign creditors. These constraints limited the policy space available for pursuing development objectives, a pattern that has recurred throughout the twentieth century and into the present.
Conclusion: The Baring Crisis in Historical Perspective
The Baring Crisis of 1890 stands as a landmark event in the history of international finance, illuminating patterns of financial instability that have recurred across time and geography. Argentina’s experience—boom, crisis, and prolonged adjustment—established a template that would be repeated throughout the country’s subsequent history and in other semi-peripheral economies worldwide.
The crisis demonstrated the vulnerabilities inherent in semi-peripheral status within the world economy. Countries like Argentina, sufficiently integrated into international capital markets to attract substantial investment but lacking the institutional depth and economic diversification of core economies, face persistent risks of financial instability. These structural vulnerabilities are difficult to address through policy reforms alone, as they reflect the country’s position within a hierarchically organized world economy.
The response to the crisis—both in Argentina and in London—established precedents that would shape subsequent approaches to financial crisis management. The Bank of England’s coordination of a private-sector rescue demonstrated the potential for lender-of-last-resort intervention to prevent systemic collapse. Argentina’s debt restructuring and fiscal adjustment illustrated the burdens that crisis countries bear in restoring access to international capital markets.
The lessons of the Baring Crisis remain relevant today. The patterns of capital flow cycles, the vulnerabilities created by fixed exchange rate regimes, the challenges of crisis management in an integrated international financial system—all of these issues, first dramatically illustrated in 1890, continue to shape economic policy debates in the twenty-first century. Understanding this historical precedent enriches our comprehension of contemporary financial instability and the challenges facing developing and emerging market economies.
References
Bordo, M. D., & Schwartz, A. J. (1996). The Operation of the Specie Standard: Evidence for Core and Peripheral Countries, 1880-1990. In J. Braga de Macedo, B. Eichengreen, & J. Reis (Eds.), Currency Convertibility: The Gold Standard and Beyond (pp. 11-83). Routledge.
Calvo, G. A. (1998). Capital Flows and Capital-Market Crises: The Simple Economics of Sudden Stops. Journal of Applied Economics, 1(1), 35-54.
della Paolera, G., & Taylor, A. M. (2001). Straining at the Anchor: The Argentine Currency Board and the Search for Macroeconomic Stability, 1880-1935. University of Chicago Press.
Eichengreen, B. (1999). Toward a New International Financial Architecture: A Practical Post-Asia Agenda. Institute for International Economics.
Ferns, H. S. (1960). Britain and Argentina in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford University Press.
Ford, A. G. (1962). The Gold Standard, 1880-1914: Britain and Argentina. Oxford University Press.
Kindleberger, C. P. (1978). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. Basic Books.
Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. Yale University Press.
Rock, D. (1987). Argentina, 1516-1987: From Spanish Colonization to Alfonsín. University of California Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, J. H. (1920). Argentine International Trade Under Inconvertible Paper Money, 1880-1900. Harvard University Press.